https://docs.google.com/present/edit?id=0AemuPpjqJ3tFZGQ2MjVncmZfMjJka2JiZ2doZg&hl=en_US
21–25 There is a coherent, incisive, insightful and richly detailed evaluative interpretation of the
extract, displaying an excellent understanding of how meaning is constructed through the use
of film language, with an excellent awareness of the extract’s relationship to the film as a
whole. There is a persuasive explanation for the selection of the extract. The critique shows
an excellent awareness of the film’s genre, its place in a broader sociocultural context, and
gives an insightful analysis of the director’s intention. Simple description will be negligible and
analysis will be clear and thorough.
In my analysis, I feel that I i did good on my presentation but i feel I did not analyze deep enough into the film’s architecture. I believe that out of 25 I would receive a 21. I did not create a deep enough diagnosis into the structure of the film’s plot. My analysis on the dialogue was solid, but I could have included actual quotes from the movie itself. I feel that my analysis was too compressed and could have been spread out into more slides, and this compression makes my analysis feel shorter than what I had hoped for. Other than that I feel it is a strong analysis despite the shortcomings.
extract, displaying an excellent understanding of how meaning is constructed through the use
of film language, with an excellent awareness of the extract’s relationship to the film as a
whole. There is a persuasive explanation for the selection of the extract. The critique shows
an excellent awareness of the film’s genre, its place in a broader sociocultural context, and
gives an insightful analysis of the director’s intention. Simple description will be negligible and
analysis will be clear and thorough.
In my analysis, I feel that I i did good on my presentation but i feel I did not analyze deep enough into the film’s architecture. I believe that out of 25 I would receive a 21. I did not create a deep enough diagnosis into the structure of the film’s plot. My analysis on the dialogue was solid, but I could have included actual quotes from the movie itself. I feel that my analysis was too compressed and could have been spread out into more slides, and this compression makes my analysis feel shorter than what I had hoped for. Other than that I feel it is a strong analysis despite the shortcomings.
*Video to be updated
Where is the actual presentation you recorded?
ReplyDelete