Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Contemporary Media Analysis



1. What does the media say about the world we live in?
Media creates a shared reality in our society. It projects the feelings of its creators as well as the needs of the audience to create an image of reality that we crave to see, whether we fear it, lust for it, or wish to experience it without discourse. Furthermore, a shared cultural attitude, it seems, creates the media we consume legitimate and acceptable. Media presents us with what someone thought was acceptable, and we consume and decide. Not only does it reflect ideas in a society, it can propagate these ideas, influencing a society and around and around and around. Media defines what a society thinks about, but not necessarily what it is.  Media is revealing that lines between the good and bad (transferred over from wars)  are blurred, such as Walt in breaking bad trying to gain money for his family, or the many possible protagonists in Game of Thrones.  There are also more positive things such as an increasingly accepted homosexuality in society (like on Glee) and the acceptance of Nerd Culture in Big Bang Theory. Furthermore, we are seeing more  sexuality and especially more violence on TV and in movies as part of medias increasingly inferiority complex.
2. Do you notice any one trend that keeps resurfacing through multiple media forms?
A trend that continually resurfaces itself  through multiple media forms is the idea of blurred lines. This can apply to the distinction of the protagonist and antagonist, and even to the distinction between good and evil in a protagonist, such as the anti-hero, which seems to be present in almost every work ever since the 70’s. Almost every modern TV show a new edgy “anti hero” who either conflicted about what he does because of his own morals, or we question his decisions by our own moral standards.
3. What do you see as the best and worst of what media portrays?
Media’s best usage is at its core, a tool. A tool of expression and consumption. As such, people feel the need to consume McDonalds Burger Meat when they also have Fillet Mignon with Salad on the menu. The worst of media is the stuff that ends up on TMZ, and I’m sure everyone is a likable person, with the benefit of a doubt, but acceptance of the hick culture or late with Duck Dynasty and Honey Boo Boo is for me a success and a failure. Its the acceptance of a culture, but is that appropriation and propagation a positive? Furthermore,
On the flipside, Media has been opening up to accept many things lately. Of course, the hick culture as above, but also Homosexuality and nerd culture have come to acceptance. Homosexuality, in particular, has been getting alot of play in many modern shows, for one, Glee is a landmark in teenage homosexual fiction, and its popularity brings its closer to mainstream.
Nerd culture has particularly come into play, not only on the TV circuit, but on the Internet Media as well(if not mainly). Big Bang Theory in the mainstreaming of nerd culture on a major television show where general audiences pretend to understand references that the cult followers really appreciate. On the internet, many what would be considered “geeky” web shows have risen to popularity, in a direct correlation with the mainstreaming of video games.
4. Where do you see yourself contributing to the conversation?
I see myself as a person obsessed with pushing the envelope. Continually film class creates an environment where healthy competition creates an ever innovating environment, leading to new boundaries to be broken with every film. I've worked on the first war film at Cappuchino Film, a sexually charged noir film, and a film that sets new standards in violence through comedy.
Media always needs ways to excite. And in the ever growing capitalist society we live in, media because raunchier and more violent every year. I feel like this trend, like all expanding trends, lead to a depression or inflation of the market and then to collapse. Therefore, I feel that media needs to come to grips that they can't always outdo last season; but more importantly: the consumer needs to do the same.  If I ever do contribute to the media itself, it will be the consumers who define what they want and how I can entertain them.

Monday, January 28, 2013

Socio-Cultural Influences in Psycho



Cultural Themes
Despite the fact that Hitchcock was British, the film address's American themes. The themes of corruption by money, lack of privacy, and multiple identity are all resultant of Hitchcock's reaction to American Society of the late 1950's.  At the time, the American Society was booming. However  this economic growth and prosperity would eventually lead to a growing corruption, and Hitchcock is warning of this growing threat, and Marion's death is directly linked to her stolen money. The theme lack of privacy comes from from the communist paranoia of the era, and the resulting intrusion of neighbors and government into the personal lives of  the people. Similarly, the theme of multiple identity comes from the idea of the apparent two faced nature of the "communist spies" that pervaded the era.

Geographical Context
The film takes place in Arizona, and was shot in the Universal Backlot. 

Historical Context

The messages from WW2 were clear: no matter how heroic your men, how skilled your generals, how staunch your supporters on the Home Front, at the end of the day it was technology that counted. Bigger. Better. Deadlier. Like the atom bomb. The horror films of the 1950s are about science and technology run riot, an accurate enough reflection of reality for a confused populace, wary of the pace of technological change. The 1950s are also the era when horror films get relegated well and truly to the B-movie category. The studios were too busy incorporating technical changes such as widespread color production and trying to meet the challenge posed by TV to have much truck with making quality horror pictures.

Also, Psychology was beginning to develop as a legitimate study at the time.  Interestingly, developmental and child psychology were major schools of thought at the time and relates to the plot of Psycho: Norman Bates witnessed his mother in bed with her lover and brutally murdered them for it. His mother also kept him very sheltered and was his only interaction for much of his life. As a result, Norman is a quiet but psychologically deranged man because of these events.  His childhood development negatively effected his ability to deal with fatherly and motherly figures.  I would say personally that the film fell under the revisionist point in its genre at its time. Before this film many horror films were creature features. The non conformist storytelling structure and new techniques used would have made it a completely new style of horror at the time. However, it could be argued to be a classic. In the current state of the horror genre today, Psycho has influenced an entire sub genre (which has become one of the most popular), the slasher genre. It set the standard for many films to follow and 

Cited http://www.shmoop.com/1950s/economy.html

http://www.horrorfilmhistory.com/index.php?pageID=1950sa